Man's Will- Free Yet Bound
by Walter J. Chantry
For more than fifteen hundred
years the Church has engaged in a heated debate over the freedom of
man's will. The major issues came to general attention in the early
fifth century when Augustine and Pelagius did battle on the subject.
Through medieval times the nature of man's freedom received a great
deal of attention. As they studied the Scriptures, Bernard and Anselm
made significant contributions to the doctrine of the human will. In
the sixteenth century the freedom or bondage of the will was one of the
chief issues dividing Reformers and Roman Catholics. To the mind of
Martin Luther, it was the key to his dispute with Rome. In the
seventeenth century the nature of man's freedom was at the heart of the
debate between Arminians and Calvinists. The conflict surfaced again in
the eighteenth century during the Great Awakening. Finney's approach to
revival in the nineteenth century led the church astray through a
misunderstanding of the human will. So too the nature of man's will
continues to bring intense disagreement between Reformed and
Fundamentalist believers.
A proper understanding of the content of the gospel and the use of
GOD-honouring methods in evangelism are dependent on one's grasp of
this issue.
Some theologians, both Arminian and Calvinistic, have been quite lucid
in their discussions concerning man's will. Others, for example,
Jonathan Edwards, have soared into the lofty clouds of philosophy where
many a believer faints in the thin air of difficult logic and complex
thought. But none is so refreshingly clear as our holy LORD. His
instruction on the subject is laced with vivid illustrations to assist
our groping minds:
Matthew 12.33-37 says, 'Either make the tree good, and his fruit
good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the
tree is known by his fruit. O generation of vipers, how can ye, being
evil, speak good things? For out of the abundance of the heart the
mouth speaketh. A good man out of the good treasure of the heart
bringeth forth good things; and an evil man out of the evil treasure
bringeth forth evil things. But I say unto you, that every idle word
that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of
judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words
thou shalt be condemned.'
In this passage are three verbal windows
through which the light of Christ's lesson passes. Each presents a
familiar scene. (1) A tree that has fruit - v. 33. (2) A man who brings
treasures out of a chest - v. 35. (3) A stream that overflows from a
fountain. This last is rather more obscure than the first two, but it
is suggested by our LORD's choice of words in v. 34. The word
'abundance' suggests superfluity or overflow.
I. Man has a will and
that will has a certain freedom. Our LORD clearly teaches that man has
a power of choice. It is important to begin here to disarm opponents of
all the foolish accusations that have been brought against the Biblical
doctrine of man's will. Every man has the ability to choose his own
words, to decide what his actions will be. We have a faculty of
self-determination in the sense that we select our own thoughts, words,
and deeds. Man is free to choose what he prefers, what he desires.
No one ties fruit on a tree's branches,
not even GOD. The tree bears its own fruit. Evil men sin voluntarily;
they take evil treasures out of their chests, that is, evil words and
deeds. Righteous men are holy by choice; they select good treasures,
that is, good words and works. The person who is speaking and acting is
completely responsible for his moral behaviour. This power of the will
is a vital part of human personality. It always exists in you and me
and in all to whom we witness or preach.
GOD never forces men to act against their
wills. By workings of outward providence or of inward grace, the LORD
may change men's minds, but He will not coerce a human being into
thoughts, words or actions. When GOD in His holy wrath sent the
Israelites to drive the Canaanites from their land, He also sent
hornets against them. There is a children's song which tells the story
of these hornets stinging the Canaanites, causing the pagans to flee
the land. The chorus then sings:
GOD never compels us to go, Oh no,
He never compels us to go;
GOD does not compel us to go 'gainst our will,
but He just makes us willing to go.
When Saul was converted, the LORD did not compel him to
edify the church instead of persecuting it. He added a new factor of
inward grace in his soul, consequently Paul changed his decision. GOD
may renew the will but He never coerces it.
The Westminster Confession is very
careful to assert the liberty of the human will. When it speaks of
GOD's eternal decrees, we are told, 'GOD from all eternity did . . .
freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass: yet so, as
thereby neither is GOD the author of sin, nor is violence offered to
the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second
causes taken away, but rather established.' When discussing Free Will,
the Confession begins, 'GOD hath endued the will of man with that
natural liberty, that it is neither forced, nor by any absolute
necessity of nature determined, to good or evil.' Neither by creation
nor by subsequent acts of GOD are man's decisions made for him; he is
free to choose for himself.
This sort of freedom of the will is
essential to responsibility! Having a will is a necessary ingredient to
being morally accountable. This is clearly implied in our LORD's words
in verses 36 and 37: 'I say unto you, that every idle word that men
shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt
be condemned.' A man can be condemned only because the words are his
own. He was free to bring them out of his treasure chest. They were the
overflow of the fountain of his own heart. They are the fruits of his
own tree of nature. No one imposed the words on his lips. He chose
them. Society, companions, parents cannot be blamed. Idle words are the
product of the man's own will.
It is vital for every minister to
appreciate the importance of man's will. For in evangelism the will
must be addressed. In preaching the gospel we are not only to shine the
light of truth upon darkened minds. We are also to appeal to men's
perverted wills to choose Christ. Faith is as much an act of the will
as it is of the mind. When by the Spirit a mind understands essential
truths, by the same Spirit the will must trust Christ. Repentance is a
selecting of good and a refusing of evil. Volition is central to faith
and repentance.
Indeed, in conversion, a man must make a
decision. We shy away from that term because in modern jargon a
'decision' has come to be identified with an outward expression, such
as raising the hand or going forward to the front. While such external
acts have nothing to do with forgiveness of sins, the heart must make a
decision to be saved.
When Christ stood to cry 'If any man
thirst, let him come unto me and drink,' He was soliciting a willing
choice of Himself as satisfying drink for the soul. GOD urges all
sinners to come just because they may come. And it is our duty
to inform the sinner that he has a warrant, a right to choose Christ.
Beyond this, we must assure him that he has a positive duty to
embrace the Saviour.
The great guilt of sinners under the
gospel is that they will not come. Christ complained in John
5.40: 'Ye will not come to me that ye might
have life.' And to Jerusalem He sobbed, 'O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, how
often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen
gathereth her chickens under her wings and ye would not !'
There is in the unregenerate hearer of the gospel an obstinate, wilful
choice not to come. Hence it is that in flaming fire Christ will come
to take vengeance on them that obey not the gospel [2
Thess 1.8]. In the free exercise of their uncoerced wills men have
rejected the Son of GOD.
In speaking of responsibility we have
implied nothing regarding ability, as will be seen below. But the point
is that men have wills which must be addressed as powerfully and
directly as their minds and emotions in gospel preaching. Men must be
confronted with their responsibility. 'This is the work of GOD, that ye
believe into Him whom He hath sent' [John 6.29].
II. Man's Will is not a Sovereign
Faculty. Although man does have a will, it is neither
independent of all influences nor supreme over all other parts of his
personality. This is the next point to be seen in our LORD's teaching.
Pelagians, Roman Catholics, Arminians and
Finneyites have all held one common view of the nature of man. They
suggest that the will of man is in some way neutral, that it exists in
a state of moral suspension. It is their understanding that with equal
ease the will can choose good or evil; it can receive or reject Christ.
With only degrees of difference and variety of explanation, this is
their common opinion. Pelagians have taught that the will is neutral
because man's heart is morally neutral. Arminians, on the other hand,
acknowledge the human heart to be evil. But they suggest that
prevenient grace has hung the will upon a 'sky hook' of neutrality from
which it can swing either to receive or to reject the gospel. The
common ground, however, is this idea of neutrality. The will, they tell
us, is disinterested. Ultimately this controls their entire view of
conversion and of sanctification.
It will be noted that our Master taught
that the human will is not free from the other faculties of the heart.
Far from the will reigning over a man, the will is determined by the
man's own character. It is not raised to a position of dominance over
the entire man.
Man is like a tree. His heart, not his
will alone, is the root. There is no possible way by which the will can
choose to produce fruit contrary to the character of the root. If the
root is bad, the tree is bound by its very nature to produce evil
fruit. Man is like a person standing alongside his treasure
chest. There is no possibility of bringing pure gold out of a box
filled only with rusty steel. The contents of the heart determine what
words and deeds may be brought out. Far from being neutral, the will
must reach into the heart for its choices. Every thought, word and deed
will partake of the nature of the treasure within. Man
is like a stream which cannot rise above its source. If the fountain is
polluted, the outflow will be evil. If the source be sweet, the stream
will not be bitter and cannot choose to be so.
These three illustrations alike contain
the same lesson. What a man is determines what he chooses. Choices of
the will always reveal the character of the heart, because the heart
determines the choices. Men are not sinners because they choose to sin;
they choose to sin because they are sinners. If this were not so, we
could never know a tree by its fruits, nor could we judge a man's
character by his acts.
In modern times we observe rockets fired
so that they escape from the earth's gravity. To accomplish this there
is a great complex of electrical wires all woven into one control
centre, called in the U.S. 'Mission Control.'
According to the Bible, the heart is the Mission Control of a man's
life. The heart is the motivational complex of a man, the basic
disposition, the entire bent of character, the moral inclination. The
mind, emotions, desires, and will are all wires which we observe; none
is independent but all are welded into a common circuit. If mission
control is wired for evil, the will cannot make the rockets of life
travel on the path of righteousness. The will cannot escape the
direction of thoughts, feelings, longings and habits to produce
behaviour of an opposite moral quality. 'Will' may be the button which
launches the spacecraft. But the launching button does not determine
the direction. Direction is dependent upon the complex wiring system.
If the will were able to make decisions
contrary to reason, and to the likes and desires of the heart, it would
be a monster. You would find yourself in a restaurant ordering all the
foods you detest. You would find yourself selecting the company you
loathe. But the will is not a monster. It cannot choose without
consulting your intelligence, reflecting your feelings, and taking
account of your desires. You are free to be yourself. The will cannot
transform you into someone else.
This is most profoundly true in the moral
and religious realms. When the mind is at war with GOD, denying His
truth; when the emotions hate Christ His Son; when the desires wish
GOD's law and gospel were exterminated from the earth; the will cannot
be in a position to choose Christ. If it were, a man would not be truly
free to be himself. Here is the tragic truth about man's
will. While free from outward coercion, it is in a state of bondage. It
is not in a stated neutrality. It is not a lever with which to move a
man's personality from sin to righteousness, from unbelief to faith.
This brings us to the third element in Christ's words.
III. Man's Will is in Bondage to
Sin. The chains which bind a man's will to sin do not result
from the actions of the Omnipotent GOD. The binding chains are the
man's own depraved faculties. The prison is his own nature.
Our LORD's rhetorical question in verse
34 brings this home with force: 'O generation of vipers, how can ye,
being evil, speak good things ?' Our wise LORD is suggesting that a man
must speak as he does because of what he is. To sinners He was saying
'You are unable to choose good words because you possess an evil heart.
If the tree is bad, if the treasure chest is filled with evil things
alone, if the fountain is bitter, your will cannot produce good words
[fruits, treasures, overflow].'
At this point there are very many
scriptures which attest to a man's bondage to sin by his own nature. To
mention but a few - Jeremiah 13.23: 'Can the Ethiopian change his skin,
or the leopard his spots? Then may ye also do good, that are accustomed
to do evil;' John 6.44: 'No man can come to me, except the Father which
hath sent me draw him;' Romans 8.7: 'The carnal mind . . . is not
subject to the law of GOD, neither indeed can be.'
Pelagian, Arminian and modern
Fundamentalist support for the moral and spiritual freedom of the will
usually centres on one point. We have admitted that man has a
responsible freedom. He is free to be himself. He is held accountable
for his words and deeds, especially for his receiving or rejecting
Christ. On all of this we agree. They use this toehold to argue that
the will is not in bondage to sin but has the power of contrary choice.
It can do either good or evil, at least when confronted with the
gospel. They insist that the responsibility of the will to choose
Christ implies ability of the will to choose Christ.
There is no scriptural defence of this
belief, none that I have ever seen in print. The argument is completely
philosophical. It runs as follows: If a man cannot do good, it would be
unjust to punish him as evil. Furthermore, if a sinner cannot repent,
it would be foolish to command all men everywhere to repent. GOD is not
foolish and He has commanded repentance. Therefore men are able to
repent.
We can only reply that those who applaud
the powers of the will with such arguments have not read the Bible very
carefully. To maintain their philosophical premises they will have to
argue with Christ their LORD. For our Prophet tells us in verses 36 and
37 of our text that in the day of judgment men will be held responsible
for their evil words. Yet in verse 34 our Teacher tells the very same
men that they cannot speak good words because they are bound by their
evil character.
Lazarus in his tomb had no ability to
respond when our LORD commanded, 'Come forth.' The man who had been
impotent for 38 years had no native ability to obey when Jesus
commanded him to take up his bed and walk. Nor have modern sinners
ability to believe when we preach. 'This is his commandment, that we
believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ' [I John 3.23].
When a sinner refuses to come to Christ,
he is guilty because he has made a free choice. It reflects his own
state of mind, feeling and attitude toward GOD and His Son. He has
acted voluntarily without coercion. It is his decision. But the poor
sinner, dead in trespasses and sins, could not do otherwise, being
evil. It is not necessary for him to have a neutral will, or the
ability to do both good and evil, for his action to be held accountable
before the Judge of all hearts.
Anselm is very helpful on this matter.
This medieval theologian points out that if ability to sin is necessary
to true liberty or responsibility, then GOD is neither free nor
praiseworthy. For the scriptures teach us that GOD cannot lie.
Similarly, saints in glory will be neither free nor responsible; for in
eternity the LORD's people have confirmed righteousness. Anselm goes on
to show the Biblical emphasis of freedom. True liberty rests in the
ability to do good whereas he that does sin is the slave of
sin. If true liberty rests in the ability to do good in GOD's sight,
then the highest liberty rests in the inability to do otherwise. This
highest freedom belongs to the sons of GOD in glory. How Biblical were
Anselm's insights!
No doubt Anselm's thinking has influenced
the Westminster Confession's wording in the chapter 'Of Free Will.' For
it says that Adam 'had freedom and power to will and to do that which
is good and wellpleasing to GOD.' Yet this freedom was mutable, subject
to change. Man could and did lose his liberty in the sense of being
able to do good. This is not the same as a man's liberty to be himself.
'Man, by his fall into a state of sin, hath wholly lost all ability of
will to any spiritual good accompanying salvation; so as a natural man,
being altogether averse from that good, and dead in sin, is not able,
by his own strength, to convert himself, or prepare himself thereto.'
Bernard was very near the truth when he
wrote of our condition in Adam: 'The soul, in some strange and evil
way, is held under this kind of voluntary, yet sadly free necessity,
both bond and free; bond in respect of necessity, free in respect of
will: and what is still more strange, and still more miserable, it is
guilty because free, and enslaved because guilty, and therefore
enslaved because free.'
We have seen that man is free to be
himself and therefore is enslaved to sin by a wicked heart. And this
brings us to the most profound truth regarding the salvation of souls.
It is crucial to our preaching. It is vital to saving impressions in
our hearers.
IV. Man's Will is not his Hope.
Our LORD has taught that the tree must be made good. Man must be
renewed in his entire character. He must have a new heart to bring
forth good fruit; the will cannot make the tree good; it may only
exercise liberty to be what the tree already is. The will cannot reload
the treasure chest with a new kind of goods; it may only freely bring
forth what is there. The will cannot cleanse the fountainhead; it may
overflow only with the waters available in the soul.
Any gospel preaching that relies upon an
act of the human will for the conversion of sinners has missed the
mark. Any sinner who supposes that his will has the strength to do any
good accompanying salvation is greatly deluded and far from the
kingdom. We are cast back upon the regenerating work of the Spirit of
the living GOD to make the tree good. Unless GOD does something in the
sinner, unless GOD creates a clean heart and renews a right spirit
within man, there is no hope of a saving change.
While we address the wills of men in gospel preaching, they are wills bound in the grave clothes of an evil heart. But as we speak, and the LORD owns His word, sinners are quickened to life by divine power. His people are made willing in the day of His power [Psa 110.3]. All who are adopted as sons of GOD were 'born not of the will of man, but of GOD.' [John 1. 13] We stand to preach with no power to make the tree good. The 'trees' before us cannot make themselves good, so no gimmicks or policies of men can persuade them to make the change. But our glorious GOD, by inward, secret, transforming power, can make the tree good, the treasures good, the fountain good. Thus all glory be to GOD and to the Lamb! Salvation is of the LORD!
“ This article reproduced by permission from THE BANNER OF TRUTH magazine, Issue 140, May 1975.”